Christ, the End of the Law

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Christ, the End of the Law

Noey
Introduction.

What does "the end of the law" mean? If someone said "the end of you," you would be seriously concerned that "end" meant "death." What else could it mean? If you have a boss who leaves the company, you could reasonably say, "That's the end of him!" "That's the end of her!" Is that the way the Bible means (Romans 10:4) that "Christ is the end of the law?" Let's plunge into our study of the Bible and see!

http://ssnet.org/lessons/14b/less07.html
Noey
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Christ, the End of the Law

Noey

07: Christ, the end of the law – Thought Starters avatar


Posted on May 14, 2014  by  Joyce Griffith
         


[Thought Questions for Christ, the End of the Law May 14, 2014]

Intro. Read the title of this week’s lesson again. What does it mean that Christ is the “end” of the law? Hasn’t the law existed forever? Don’t we love God’s law in the same way the psalmist David did? Doesn’t the law reflect the character of Christ? Then how can Christ be the end of it? Take a long hard look at this week’s lesson because there are blessings around every corner.

 
1. Sin abounded, but not like grace did. What is the spiritual connection between sin and death? Between sin and grace? In Romans 5:20 Paul states that “the law was brought in so that the trespass might increase.” Then what benefit is the law to us? So we’ll sin more? Understand our sins better? Sin is “transgression of the law.” Do you have problems keeping the 10 Commandments? Does sin exist outside the violation of those 10 rules? Why does God offer the huge reward of eternal life to those who keep His commandments? What is the greatest command of all?

2. Jesus did it all. Did Jesus keep the law perfectly? Does His obedience cover our sinfulness? If so, why do we even need to think about the law and risk being called legalists? If not, what did Jesus’ upholding of the law do for us? If we love Jesus, isn’t that all He requires? Hasn’t His sacrifice solved the sin problem forever? What does the law give us as Christians that we can’t obtain outside of the law?

3. Wretched man. Do you ever feel worthless? condemned? unholy? spiritually unclean? Can you have those feelings even without committing sin that would be obvious to those around you? Do you think the “wretched man” of Romans 7 represents Paul before His conversion? Or afterwards? When we consider that sin begins as a mere thought and seems to be lurking in our lives continually, what hope is there for the Christian?

4. Law’s end. Have you noticed that many people think of Sabbath keepers as worshippers of the law? Why do people, even within our church, often develop an “allergy” to law because of its association with cold, dead legalism? Have you ever tried to convince someone that you’re not a legalist? If so, did you have any success? When the law points out our failings, how can that be a blessing to us? What is the “end” or the final goal of the law? How can we place God’s love at the center of every aspect of His law?

5. The Disciplinarian. In what way is the law our schoolmaster? Did you always love and respect your teachers? If you love God as supreme, will you welcome His instruction, His advice, and even His discipline as you walk with Him? Why are we so tempted to think of ourselves as free from legalism and yet caught up in trusting in the law as if it can save us? If we as a church love God and look for every possible way to share that love with others in and outside the church, can the law of God be seen as the law of love in us?
Noey
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Christ, the End of the Law

Noey

Further Study: Christ, the End of the Law avatar


Posted on May 15, 2014  by  Sabbath School Lesson
         


Further Study: “The law reveals sin to us, and causes us to feel our need of Christ and to flee unto Him for pardon and peace by exercising repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ. . . .studymore

“The law of ten commandments is not to be looked upon as much from the prohibitory side, as from the mercy side. Its prohibitions are the sure guarantee of happiness in obedience. As received in Christ, it works in us the purity of character that will bring joy to us through eternal ages. To the obedient it is a wall of protection. We behold in it the goodness of God, who by revealing to men the immutable principles of righteousness, seeks to shield them from the evils that result from transgression.”-Ellen G. White, Selected Messages, book one, pp. 234, 235.

Discussion Questions:

1.In class, talk about the wonderful hope found in Galatians 3:21. How is the gospel of grace so clearly presented there? Why should this text be the absolute antidote to legalism?

2.Godly living is not optional for those who call themselves children of God. Many well-meaning individuals stress the need for us to attain “perfection” if we desire to enter the kingdom. Unfortunately, not only do those who embrace this doctrine promote self-sufficiency as a key to salvation, but they ignore the reality of sinful human nature. Humans have to live with inherited tendencies toward sin and are constantly bombarded with temptation. Even more troubling is the discouragement that can come to those who are constantly looking to themselves and how well they are doing as a barometer of their salvation. Compared to the holiness of God and His law, who among us can ever measure up? How, then, can we be careful that while seeking to live godly, faithful lives, we do not get caught up in any theology that puts the hope of our salvation in anything other than the righteousness of Christ covering us?

3.What is the goal of the law?
Noey
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Christ, the End of the Law

Noey
Christ, the End of the Law
 
Stephen Terry
 
 
Commentary for the May 17, 2014 Sabbath School Lesson
 
 
http://www.visitstillwaters.com/poison.jpg“…as he thinketh in his heart, so is he…” Proverbs 23:7, KJV
 
A close friend begins acting strangely. Convinced that they are ill, we call 911 for an ambulance. However, another friend remembers that a doctor lives in the neighborhood and runs to fetch him. In a few moments, the doctor arrives with his black bag of remedies. Examining the patient, he determines that she is running a fever and gives her some aspirin to bring the fever down. “That should do the trick,” he says.
 
But after a few moments, red splotches appear on her skin. “Obviously an allergic reaction,” he says and gives her an antihistamine for the splotches. But instead of getting better, she begins to vomit. “I have something for that,” he reassures everyone and gives her an anti-emetic. In spite of his best efforts, however, she expires just as the ambulance arrives. When the cause of death is later determined, it is discovered that the patient had accidentally ingested poison and death occurred because the doctor was treating only the symptoms and not the disease. While this is just a parable, it illustrates a point that has spiritual applications as well.
 
Some Christians, like the doctor in the parable, appear to be specialists at treating symptoms. Their answer for every struggling Christian is the same: a good dose of obedience. Never mind that when they apply this remedy, they lose as many as they save. Like a mentally-sick physician, they blame the patient for expiring rather than their lack of skill. Worse, they even cast a black stain on the character of God by calling such losses “The Shaking,” implying that God would drive His sheep from Him just as they are doing. For such Christians, it is always “The Law! The Law! The Law!” as though this were the sum and total of all God is and desires.
 
In order to understand the problem, perhaps we should look at the problem of sin. It is true that John related sin to law-breaking.[i] However, in historical context, John was a Jew looking at Christianity from a Jewish context where the Law was supreme, at times placing the Law even above issues of compassion and grace. In contrast to the legalism of many Jewish Christians, Jesus was often accused of being a law-breaker. Perhaps it was because of this that He felt it necessary to reassure those present for His Sermon on the Mount that He was not attempting to destroy the Law.[ii] Nonetheless, His apparent disregard for obedience by healing on the Sabbath when people very easily could have been healed on any other day raised the ire of some in His day. They felt that He should be focusing on the symptom of disobedience and not on the diseases He healed. Some continue to feel the same today.
 
Perhaps this is related to how they see the origin of sin in the first place. Some look at the Garden of Eden and the original sin[iii] and see only an issue of obedience. God said don’t do something. Adam and Eve did not obey what God said. Therefore sin is disobedience. If sin is indeed simply a transgression of the Law, then this would seem to be correct. However, we have a bit of a problem when we examine the teachings of Jesus. He taught that sin exists before there is any act of disobedience.[iv] If this is true, then in order to see the sin of Adam and Eve we have to look before the act of disobedience occurred. When we do look there, we find that the sin was not eating the fruit. That was only the symptom that told us that sin had been working in their hearts. The actual sin was distrust. This distrust caused them to rely on the words of the Serpent rather than what God had told them. It was this distrust that also caused them to hide from God later when He sought them in the Garden.
 
Perhaps we can test the validity of this idea by returning to the life of Jesus. When a wealthy, young man came to Jesus, he assured Jesus that he was perfectly obedient to the Law.[v] However, Jesus revealed to him that just as Adam and Eve trusted the Serpent rather than God, so this young man trusted his wealth rather than God. This also seems to illustrate that obedience is not the answer, trust is. When there is trust, there is no question of obeying or not obeying. We only know that we trust what God does, thinks or asks. We don’t even consider it a question of obedience.
 
This may be hard to understand from a human perspective because mankind is not trustworthy.[vi] Because we cannot read hearts as God is able to do, we often look for acts of obedience to an agreement to assure us that someone is trustworthy. We have gone from verbal agreements to handshakes and finally to written contracts in order to bind ourselves to obedience. Yet, in spite of all of this, the courts are clogged with actions resulting from the untrustworthiness of the parties involved.
 
 Maybe this is why God at times entered into covenants with people in the Old Testament, not because the covenant was anything, but because man’s basic problem was his lack of trust in God. Therefore, the only way man could understand that God was trustworthy was to see Him be obedient to a covenant. Unfortunately, while it revealed the trustworthiness of God, it also revealed mankind’s total untrustworthiness. Even the best among us failed to completely abide by the covenants we had with God. Moses struck the rock.[vii] David committed adultery.[viii] Elijah fled from Jezebel.[ix] These are only a few egregious examples among many. For this reason, there could be no salvation by the covenant of the Law, only a revelation of man’s sin,[x] his untrustworthiness as compared with the trustworthiness of God.
 
This failure to trust is at the root of how we treat others as well, not only God. If we do not trust God to care for us, then we will accumulate all that we can in an attempt to assure our own future, just like the wealthy, young man. We will perhaps see sharing that wealth as a threat to our own security, and compassion toward our fellow man will die. Sadly, we even see this with institutions and churches who, rather than trust in God, are constantly appealing for money, at times even from those who are least able to give: the poor, the infirm, and the elderly. As a panacea for the suffering they cause, they promise blessings from God that they neither own nor have the power to bestow. Ironically, when they do not receive gifts from their victims, they accuse them of not trusting God. Truly this is a pot calling the kettle black.
 
If no amount of obedience will save us, how do we restore the trust that is salvific? Perhaps we do so by trusting God and acting trustworthy ourselves. When we trust God we will have no fear of loss when we care for the sick, the hungry and thirsty poor, and the prisoner.[xi] We will not see them as a threat to our own well-being as we know God will take care of us, no matter what others might take from us.
 
Churches spend millions and millions of dollars to tell others about God, and when those individuals respond by joining the church, we immediately tap into their wallets to keep the perpetual evangelism machine going. All the while, we teach that obedience to church dogma will be the deciding factor that will save them on that great day when Jesus returns. Operated by obedience and greased by money those wheels will continue to turn until God himself puts an end to it. However, the gospel message is a simple message of compassion and grace. We share what we have with the less fortunate because this is what Jesus did for us. They are not the enemy. They are our reason to exist.
 
If we were trustworthy in caring for the needy among us, we would not need million dollar advertising budgets. Word of mouth would do all the advertising we would need. We would not need expensive multi-media campaigns to get our story out. Friends would tell friends of what they experienced at our hands. Perhaps this is why we feel we need those advertising campaigns, because friends are telling friends, and the story hasn’t been good. However, spin doctors are not the answer if people don’t trust us. Just like God, we need to prove ourselves trustworthy. If we did, what a fire we would light in the Earth. To others, we are not the large and elegant churches we build. We are not the beautiful music we play. We are not the healthy lifestyle we live. We are not even the Bible stories we can tell. We are simply who we are to them based on whether or not we are trustworthy in their time of need. Come to think of it, isn’t that who God is to us as well?
 
 


[i] 1 John 3:4
[ii] Matthew 5:17
[iii] Genesis 3
[iv] Matthew 5:28
[v] Matthew 19:16-22
[vi] John 2:24-25
[vii] Exodus 17:6
[viii] 2 Samuel 11
[ix] 1 Kings 19:1-9
[x] Romans 7:7
[xi] Matthew 25:31-46
Noey
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Christ, the End of the Law

Noey
Contemporary Comments

 "Christ, the End of the Law"
May 17, 2014

Texts: Romans 5:12-21; 6:15-23; 7:13-25; 9:30-10:4; Galatians 3:19-24
 
Have you ever broken one of God's Ten Commandment laws? Is breaking a commandment sin? What about Romans 6:23, "the wages of sin is death" or Romans 3:23, "all have sinned and come short of the glory of God"? Since Jesus suffered on the cross and died for everyone's sins, are we free from God's law?

In our Bible study this week the Apostle Paul is writing to churches in Rome and Galatia. Paul was a Jew. He knew that regardless of whether one was a Jew or a Gentile, every human being was impacted by sin. Paul preached that no amount of law-keeping, use of knowledge, or even one's elected power, could free them from sin. Salvation from sin could only come through faith and the grace of Christ's death on the cross.

To help twenty-first century believers grasp the important relationship between God's law, sin, and God's grace, pastors sometimes use a visual example. When preaching on this topic, Evangelist C.D. Brooks called seven children onto the platform to help him. For purpose of example, Brooks gave the seven children names: Sin, Law, Grace, Savior, Gospel, Preacher, and Church. When he spoke any of those words, he pointed to the child who illustrated that word. Picture him doing that in this statement:

"The Bible says that sin is the transgression of God's law. Whoever hates sin must uphold the law. Whoever fights the law is upholding sin whether we like it or not. Grace is pardon for sin which is breaking the law. The Savior died that we might have grace which is pardon for sin which is breaking the law. The Savior gave us the gospel which is the good news about the law. The preacher preaches the gospel in his church."1

So when someone says, "the law is done away with," Brooks shows the fallacy of this thinking by pointing to the appropriate child as he sends them back to sit with their parents.

If we do away with the law (child named law leaves) the Bible says where there is no law there is no sin.

If we do away with sin (child named sin leaves) you don't need grace which is pardon for sin which is breaking the law.

If we don't need grace (child indicating grace leaves) we certainly don't need a Savior who died that we might have grace which is pardon for sin which is breaking the law.

You don't need a gospel (gospel leaves) because the gospel is the account of a Savior who died that we might have grace which is the pardon for sin which is breaking the law.

That being the case we would not need a preacher (preacher leaves) and if you don't need a preacher, we may as well throw away the church (church leaves).2

Grace, then, is pardon for sin which is breaking the law. Everyone is a sinner save by the Savior's grace.

~ck

1. wordpress
2. Ibid
Noey